What is the history of Magnet Therapy?
Magnetism is both leading-edge science and traditional therapy that has been used by the Chinese for 5,000 years. Since then, many cultures have tried magnets with varying results. It is said that Cleopatra had a lode stone (natural magnet) under her pillow to sleep on at night. Paracelsus, a scientist in the late 1400’s, used them successfully with seizures and many other illnesses. More recently, dual pole magnets have proven to be an effective healing protocol for most diseases.
What is BioMagnet Therapy and Zeta Potential?
The penetration value is how deep into the tissue the magnetic effect penetrates. It is very simple – if there is a deep tissue condition, the magnet must be strong enough to penetrate the energy to stimulate the cells correctly. Remember that the effect of the magnets is an all or nothing scenario. The magnets are either 100% effective, or they do no harm = 0% effective. All biomagnetic therapeutic magnets are designed to specifically reach the required A-Z penetration values. After a quarter of a century of development, you can be assured the magnetic power used in this therapy has been designed for the proper penetration values to help the body heal rapidly – whether you have pain, chronic illness or an acute condition.
(Natural News) Researchers from Northwestern University in Chicago conducted a pilot study that tested the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prevention of age-related memory decline. The results, published in an online issue of Neurology on April 17, 2019, suggest that memory can be enhanced temporarily using magnetic fields. The magnetic fields purportedly stimulate nerve cells in the brain, boosting brain activity in the hippocampal-cortical network. This part of the brain helps create, store, and retrieve memories.
The device used in this study contains an electromagnetic coil. The researchers held the coil adjacent to a participant’s scalp. Short bursts of magnetic energy course through the participant’s scalp to target specific regions of their brain. Study author Joel L. Voss, Ph.D. said, “With stimulation, we were able to essentially excite the areas of the brain that are involved in memory formation in older adults, improving their ability to recall items as well as younger adults.
Immediately after magnetic stimulation, elder adults memorize as well as 25 year-olds.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-09-15-magnetic-stimulation-of-the-brain-prevent-memory-decline.html?fbclid=IwAR0rTEZ4IsXyOWvYWZzg1RlyOi54eUjy4zKnhD21Mbcl2DPWj2cSRQ7rAMkFifteen people with an average age of seventy-two participated in the study and were asked to complete memory tasks. These adults showed signs of age-related memory loss, but could still think clearly. They did not show signs of Alzheimer’s or dementia. Another group of adults with an average age of twenty-five performed the same memory task as the elder adults. In the first week, the elder adults submitted to transcranial magnetic stimulation once a day for five days in a row. In the second week, the elder adults underwent a fake treatment. Under the fake treatment, they submitted to the electromagnetic coil but did not receive a significant dose of magnetic energy. The elder participants did not know when they were receiving a real treatment or a fake one.
In my nearly two decades as a member of Issseem (International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine), I’ve learned that when people use the phrase “science of subtle energy” (SSE), they are generally referring to one or more of the following lines of evidence:•direct personal experiences of healing, out-of-body experiences (OBEs), auras, pre-monitions, meditative experiences, and so on—also described in a huge body of popular literature and shared in many forums (like this one)•the teachings of such non-Western healing and spiritual practices as acupuncture, qigong, and yoga, as well as shamanism and alchemy
•the frequent use of the terms “science” and “subtle energy” (or related terms) in the many materials “channeled” over the past several hundred years from various not-in-the-body sources
•a growing number of studies that appear to show the effects of energies not otherwise measurable—overviews of such studies have been published by NCCAM (National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine) and others (e.g., The Scientific Basis of Integrative Medicine by Leonard Wisneski and Lucy Anderson)
•a large array of devices (e.g., electrodermal screening, bioresonance therapies, electro-photonic imaging) used in alternative health practices around the world, some of which were used in the studies cited above and all of which remain controversial
•a variety of “New Physics” theories that feature subtle energy and are widely regarded as plausible, including the work of Stanford scientist William Tiller, biophysicist Beverly Rubik, and former Princeton University physicist Claude Swanson.Given the above, why does mainstream science seem so dead set against even thenotion of subtle energy? Four reasons readily come to mind:
•There is no agreed-upon scientific definition of subtle energy, and hence no reliable meth-odo logy for detecting or measuring the energies so defined.
•There is no broadly accepted scientific theory of such energies.
•The very notion of subtle energy originates in pre-scientific esoteric traditions, which havebeen systematically marginalized by the scientific enterprise for more than a century.
•The notion is thus considered far too subjective, or worse, a point of religious belief, or worse yet, a mere superstition